Carol

What is PIFR and why consider it in COPD patients?

  • Peak inspiratory flow rate, or PIFR, is the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled over the time course of 1 deep breath, measured in L/min
  • The more severe the patient's COPD and the older they are, the lower their PIFR1,2

Why can PIFR be a concern with a dry powder inhaler (DPI) for COPD patients?

  • DPIs rely on inspiratory flow
  • Low PIFR may lead to marked reductions in*
    • Fine particles/emitted dose reaching lungs2-4
    • Lung deposition5,6
  • Most DPI devices require a minimum PIFR 30 L/min1,7,8
  • PIFR > 60 L/min may help to maximize drug delivery1,7,8

*Based on studies designed to measure inspiratory flow rates and drug delivery at different levels of resistance. These studies were not designed to evaluate efficacy or safety.

As with other beta2-agonists, BROVANA can produce paradoxical bronchospasm that might be life-threatening. If paradoxical bronchospasm occurs, BROVANA should be discontinued immediately and alternative therapy instituted.

BROVANA, like beta2-agonists, can produce a clinically significant cardiovascular effect in some patients as measured by inscreases in pulse rate, blood pressure, and/or other symptoms.

Nebulized therapy may be the right fit


When COPD patients...

  • Have low PIFR
  • Have difficulty performing deep breaths needed to use a DPI

BROVANA is not indicated for the treatment of acute episodes of bronchospasm, ie, rescue therapy, and does not replace fast-acting rescue inhalers.

Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information for BROVANA, including Boxed Warning.


References:

1. Jarvis S, Ind PW, Shiner RJ. Inhaled therapy in elderly COPD patients; time for re-evaluation? Age Ageing. 2007;36(2):213-218. 2. Al-Showair RAM, Tarsin WY, Assi KH, Pearson SB, Chrystyn H. Can all patients with COPD use the correct inhalation flow with all inhalers and does training help? Respir Med. 2007;101(11):2395-2401.3. Virchow JC, Crompton GK, Dal Negro R, et al. Importance of inhaler devices in the management of airway disease. Respir Med. 2008;102(1):10-19. 4. Prime D, Grant AC, Slater AL, Woodhouse RN. A critical comparison of the dose delivery characteristics of four alternative inhalation devices delivering salbutamol: pressurized metered dose inhaler, Diskus inhaler, Diskhaler inhaler, and Turbuhaler inhaler. J Aerosol Med. 1999;12(2):75-84. 5. BorgstrÕm L, Bondesson E, MorÉn F, Trofast E, Newman SP. Lung deposition of budesonide inhaled via Turbuhaler®: a comparison with terbutaline sulphate in normal subjects. Eur Respir J. 1994;7(1):69-73.6. Derom E, Strandgården K, Schelfhout V, Borgstrõm L, Pauwels R. Lung deposition and efficacy of inhaled formoterol in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Respir Med. 2007;101(9):1931-1941.7. Janssens W, VandenBrande P, Hardeman E, et al. Inspiratory flow rates at different levels of resistance in elderly COPD patients. Eur Respir J. 2008;31(1):78-83.
8. Broeders MEAC, Molema J, Vermue NA, Folgering HTM. In Check Dial: accuracy for Diskus and Turbuhaler. Int J Pharm. 2003;252(1-2):275-280. 9. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (2010). http://www.goldcopd.org. Accessed March 15, 2011. 10. Dolovich MB, Ahrens RC, Hess DR, et al. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: evidence-based guidelines. Chest. 2005;127(1):335-371.